Breast Reconstruction Options At A Glance

Here's a great infographic summarizing the breast reconstruction options available these days:

Some additional important points:

"Immediate" vs "delayed" breast reconstruction simply describes when the breast reconstruction process begins. Most approaches require more than 1 surgery and the whole reconstruction process can take several months to complete regardless of when it starts. The benefits of immediate reconstruction (same time as the mastectomy) include avoiding the experience of living without a breast, less scarring and better cosmetic results (especially when combined with nipple-sparing mastectomy). You can see patient before and after pictures here.

Many of the above procedures are often combined. For example, tissue expanders or implants can be used in conjunction with flaps. The most common combination is a tissue expander with a latissimus ("lat") flap. Fat grafting is also frequently used in combination with any of the above techniques to address contour deformities, hide implant rippling, add volume, or simply make the results more "natural".

Unfortunately, many of the above procedures are not offered by all plastic surgeons. I encourage all of you to do your own research, ask questions, and if at all possible, consult with plastic surgeons experienced in all types of breast reconstruction before making a final decision.

Dr C
*****

Dr Chrysopoulo is a breast reconstruction surgeon in San Antonio, TX, specializing in the DIEP flap and other state-of-the-art breast reconstruction procedures. In-network for most US insurance plans. Patients are welcomed from across and outside the US. Please call (800) 692-5565 or email patientadvocate@PRMAplasticsurgery.com to learn more about your breast reconstruction options. Connect with Dr C on Twitter and Facebook.

*****

Does Immediate Breast Reconstruction Delay Chemotherapy?

Many patients think or are told they cannot have immediate breast reconstruction (reconstruction at the same time as mastectomy) because it will significantly delay chemotherapy. In reality, breast reconstruction very rarely interferes with chemotherapy.

Patients that have immediate reconstruction and need chemotherapy can start their treatments once they have healed from their surgery. This usually takes about 4 weeks. The healing time required before chemotherapy is about the same whether patients have mastectomy alone or mastectomy and reconstruction.

A small percentage of patients develop wound healing problems after their cancer surgery and may need slightly longer to heal completely. Even in these situations, studies have shown there is typically no delay in starting chemotherapy. Patients must also realize that wound healing problems can also happen after mastectomy alone.

In addition to the psycho-social benefits, immediate breast reconstruction is associated with less scarring and better cosmetic results. Patients that have delayed breast reconstruction, ie reconstruction some time after the mastectomy, complete all their breast cancer treatment before proceeding with reconstruction.

I hope this info helps.

Dr C

*****

Dr Chrysopoulo is a board certified plastic surgeon and microsurgeon in San Antonio, TX specializing in state-of-the-art reconstructive breast surgery. He and his partners at PRMA are in-network for most major US insurance plans. Patients are welcomed from across and outside the US. Please call (800) 692-5565 or email patientadvocate@PRMAplasticsurgery.com to learn more about your breast reconstruction options. Connect with other breast cancer patients on Facebook.

*****

Has Your Partner Been Diagnosed With Breast Cancer?

In the vast majority of cases, a breast cancer diagnosis affects more than one person. All the focus understandably centers around the patient in formulating the best treatment plan. However, as physicians, I feel we generally do a bad job of considering the patient's support system, and the primary caregiver in particular.

Following one of my patients' breast cancer diagnosis, mastectomy and reconstruction, I asked her husband how he was coping and if there was any way we could be of more help.

He told me: "You're the first one who's even asked me how I'm doing. There's no manual. I can't fix this. I have a million thoughts but no words to express them".

His last comment really hit the nail on the head.

Please know you are not alone...

Here are some other credible resources that may help.

I wish you all the best.

Dr C

*****

Dr C is a board certified plastic surgeon and microsurgeon specializing in state-of-the-art breast reconstruction. He and his partners at PRMA are In-Network for most US insurance plans. Patients are welcomed from across and outside the US. Please call (800) 692-5565 or email patientadvocate@PRMAplasticsurgery.com to learn more about your breast reconstruction options. Connect with others touched by breast cancer in our Facebook community.

*****

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

Nipple-sparing mastectomy in conjunction with immediate breast reconstruction is becoming more and more popular so I thought a blog post about it was in order...

What is a nipple-sparing mastectomy?

A nipple-sparing mastectomy preserves the nipple,  areola and all the surrounding breast skin which is then used for the breast reconstruction. Unlike the traditional "modified radical mastectomy", nipple-sparing mastectomy only removes the breast tissue ("parenchyma") under the skin.

What are the benefits?

Studies show that nipple-sparing mastectomy provides the same level of surgical treatment as a modified radical mastectomy in appropriate candidates. Preserving the nipple-areola complex adds to the quality of the reconstruction making the results even more "natural". It also means the patient avoids having to go through the additional steps of nipple reconstruction and tattooing.

Who is a candidate?

Nipple-sparing mastectomy is an option for many patients with a small cancer located several centimeters away from the nipple-areola complex. Patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can also be candidates, again depending on the location and distance from the nipple-areola.

During the surgery, a biopsy ("frozen section") is taken from behind the nipple-areola complex and sent to pathology to make sure there is no cancer under the nipple or areola. If this biopsy is negative then the area can be preserved. If it is positive for cancer cells, the nipple and areola are obviously removed.

Patients at high risk of breast cancer (eg BRCA+, strong family history, Cowden's syndrome) choosing to undergo prophylactic (preventive) mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction are the best candidates.

Patients who do not need a signficant breast lift will have the best cosmetic results.

What are the risks?

Nipple sensation is usually significantly reduced. Sometimes feeling is lost completely. Even in cases where some nipple-areola sensation is maintained, it is very unlikely the feeling will be as Mother Nature provided.

The underside of the nipple and areola is "shaved down" to remove as much of the breast tissue as possible. This can sometimes compromise the blood supply to the tissue which can then cause healing problems. If the blood supply is damaged too much by the mastectomy, part or all of the nipple-areola can die. Thankfully this is uncommon.

At PRMA we check the blood flow intra-operatively to ensure the nipple-areola will survive. In the unlikely event that the nipple-areola cannot be saved, it is removed to prevent wound healing complications and a new nipple and areola are reconstructed at a later time.

Where will the scars be?

This depends on the size and shape of the breast, whether a small "lift" is needed, patient preference and surgeon preference. Scars can be placed around part of the areola and extended outwards or downwards, or completely away from the areola at the breast crease ("inframmamary fold incision").


I hope this info helps!

Dr C

*****

Dr Chrysopoulo specializes in advanced breast reconstruction including DIEP flap, SIEA flap, GAP flap, TUG flap, Alloderm One-Step and fat grafting. He is in-Network for most US insurance plans. Patients are routinely welcomed from across the USA. Please call (800) 692-5565 or email patientadvocate@PRMAplasticsurgery.com to learn more about your breast reconstruction options. Connect with other breast cancer patients at facebook.com/PRMAplasticsurgery.

*****

Reconstructing Breasts with Sensation

Most women facing mastectomy and breast reconstruction want to know what kind of feeling their new breast(s) will have.

Unfortunately mastectomy leaves many women with very little feeling long term (if any), regardless of whether they have breast reconstruction or not.

There is some good news though.... Most women undergoing DIEP or SIEA flap breast reconstruction are also candidates for reconstruction of the sensory nerves in the breasts that provide feeling. The feeling in the new breast won't be as good as what Mother Nature provided but it's certainly a lot better than the alternative. A nice bonus at the very least.

Once the tummy tissue (flap) is moved up to the breast, a sensory nerve in the flap is connected microsurgically to a breast nerve in the chest that was cut by the mastectomy. New nerve cells grow from the chest nerve into the flap nerve over time allowing the reconstructed breast to develop feeling.

If you're feeling brave, here's a short video clip of how the two nerves are connected. You can also see the pulse in the blood vessel connections to the new breast:

I hope this info helps.

Dr C

*****

PRMA Plastic Surgery specializes in advanced breast reconstruction including DIEP flap, SIEA flap, GAP flap, TUG flap and Alloderm One-Step. In-Network for most US insurance plans. Patients routinely welcomed from across the USA. Please call (800) 692-5565 or email patientadvocate@PRMAplasticsurgery.com to learn more about your breast reconstruction options. Connect with other breast cancer reconstruction patients at www.facebook.com/PRMAplasticsurgery.

*****

Breast Reconstruction Makes Breast Cancer Patients Whole Again After Mastectomy

Alarmingly, 70% of American women facing surgery for breast cancer are not told about the option of breast reconstruction.

Perhaps one of the best things about breast reconstruction is that it can be performed at any time….  you can never “miss the boat” so to speak. Regardless of the timing of the procedure, breast reconstruction enables women to feel whole again, not just physically but also emotionally.

There are several reconstructive options ranging from breast implants to using the patient’s own tissue. Tissue (or “flap”) procedures recreate a “natural”, warm, soft breast and are associated with fewer complications than breast implants.

Breast reconstruction can be performed at the same time as the mastectomy ("immediate reconstruction") or any time after mastectomy ("delayed reconstruction"). 
When the mastectomy and reconstruction are performed at the same time, a skin-sparing mastectomy can usually be performed which saves most of the natural breast skin envelope. Only the actual breast tissue under the skin is removed. The reconstruction then "fills" this empty skin envelope. In some cases nipple-sparing mastectomy can be performed. This preserves the nipple and areola as well as all the breast skin.



Skin-sparing (and nipple-sparing) mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction produce the most "natural" results with the least scarring. Patients undergoing immediate reconstruction also avoid the experience of a flat chest altogether. Immediate reconstruction is therefore preferred whenever possible and should be the goal for patients with early breast cancer (stage I or II).

In some cases breast reconstruction cannot be performed at the same time as the mastectomy. Reasons include advanced breast cancer (stage III or IV), inflammatory breast cancer, the plan for radiation therapy after mastectomy, and lack of access to a reconstructive plastic surgeon.

As I already mentioned at the beginning of this post, most women unfortunately are not made aware of their breast reconstruction options. I therefore encourage all women interested in breast reconstruction to research their options and seek a referral or consultation with a plastic surgeon specializing in breast reconstruction.

You can see real patient results after immediate and delayed breast reconstruction in our photo gallery here.

Dr C


*****

PRMA Plastic Surgery specializes in advanced breast reconstruction procedures that use the patient's own tissue. Procedures offered include the DIEP flap, SIEA flap, GAP flap, and TUG flap reconstruction. We are In-Network for most US insurance plans. Patients are routinely welcomed from across and outside the USA. Connect with other breast cancer reconstruction patients at www.facebook.com/PRMAplasticsurgery.

*****

Texas Bill Mandates Breast Reconstruction Discussion Before Breast Cancer Surgery

Currently only 30% of breast cancer patients are informed of their breast reconstruction options before mastectomy or lumpectomy.

New legislation is being proposed in Texas that aims to significantly improve that abysmal statistic for breast cancer patients. Texas House Bill 669 would mandate that doctors inform all breast cancer patients about their breast reconstruction options BEFORE having surgery for breast cancer. The bill was drafted based on similar legislation in the state of New York.

PRMA Plastic Surgery is proud to announce that a former patient, Tammy Carrington, is the team leader behind this Bill.  She proactively sought out her state representative, James White, to begin drafting proposals.  The Bill was drafted and submitted January 14, 2011.  If approved, this statute will take effect the following year.

Tammy Carrington knows firsthand what it’s like to be diagnosed with breast cancer and receive limited treatment options.  After being diagnosed in June of 2009, Tammy was given two options: a lumpectomy with radiation or a unilateral mastectomy.  Tammy didn’t want either.

Tammy wanted to decrease the risk of breast cancer in the future in the other breast too. After intensely researching her options on her own she learned she could have bilateral mastectomies and immediate reconstruction. Ultimately she traveled to PRMA in San Antonio and underwent bilateral mastectomies with immediate DIEP flap breast reconstruction using her own abdominal tissue.  All the procedures were covered by her health insurance.

Not surprisingly, Tammy feels very strongly about this Bill since she so easily could have chosen something she feels would have been the wrong option for her.

"My nature is to research things completely so that I can make informed decisions. I am the mom to a severely brain injured little boy… I’ve spent lots of time over the years looking for information on how to help him get better… After getting over the shock of hearing the 'C' word,... I went into research mode”, Tammy recalls.

“HB 669 isn’t mandating any particular treatment. It's not mandating any surgery. It's just mandating education. Women have the right to be told about their options so they can make truly informed decisions about their own health. Unfortunately, right now only 30% are even told breast reconstruction is an option”, she says.

PRMA Plastic Surgery is proud to support HB 669 and is calling on breast cancer patients, physicians, and all those touched by breast cancer throughout the state of Texas to offer their support by calling their representatives.

Please call your State Legislator and urge them to co-author HB 669. Your state representative’s contact information can be found HERE.

****

PRMA Plastic Surgery in San Antonio, Texas, specializes in advanced breast reconstruction using the patient's own tissue. Procedures offered include the DIEP flap, SIEA flap, GAP flap, and TUG flap. We are In-Network for most US insurance plans. Patients are routinely welcomed from across Texas, out-of-state, as well as from outside the USA. Connect with other breast cancer reconstruction patients at www.facebook.com/PRMAplasticsurgery

****

Breast Reconstruction: New Video Discusses Latest Breast Reconstruction Options

Breast reconstruction surgery restores something that nature has provided but cancer has taken away.

Unfortunately, most American women with breast cancer do not even realize they have the option of breast reconstruction after mastectomy or lumpectomy.

Breast reconstruction is not a cosmetic procedure.... it is every woman's right: it restores something that nature has provided but cancer has taken away. It is also covered by insurance thanks to a Federal Mandate passed in 1998.

Despite this mandate, studies alarmingly show that only 30% of women facing mastectomy are even offered the option of breast reconstruction.

Women have many reconstructive options after mastectomy or lumpectomy. These range from breast implants to "autologous" techniques which use the patient's own tissue to recreate a more "natural", warm, soft breast. The nipple and areola (the darker area surrounding the nipple) can also be recreated.

Growing Breasts from Fat Stem Cells: the Future of Breast Reconstruction

A new form of breast reconstruction that allows women to re-grow breasts from their own fat stem cells after a mastectomy could be offered to British and Australian breast cancer patients for the first time in 2010.

A human trial of the new technique is being planned by plastic surgeons at a London hospital. The trial will study whether fat cells can be induced to multiply and fill a breast-shaped mold implanted under the chest skin to recreate a breast after mastectomy. Australian scientists also recently announced that they would start similar treatments on women within six months, following animal studies involving mice and pigs that successfully re-grew breasts from fat.

If the human trials are as successful, this new technique could transform breast reconstruction surgery, offering an alternative to breast implant reconstruction and more complex tissue transfer techniques requiring significant down-time.

The technique is expected to take about eight months to grow a breast. Initially it will only be used to reconstruct breast cancer patients who have been cancer-free for at least 2 years. Eventually it may also be used for cosmetic breast augmentation allowing women to achieve a significantly larger breast size without needing saline or silicone implants.

The Australian team is led by Professor Wayne Morrison of the Bernard O’Brien Institute of Microsurgery in Melbourne. After a decade or so of working on this project he has now obtained ethical approval for a trial involving a handful of women.

I had the pleasure of listening to a presentation by Dr Morrison at the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery in 2008. The technique involves using liposuction to remove some of the woman’s own fat cells. The concentration of stem cells within this fat is then boosted in the laboratory. A biocompatible scaffold is then implanted under the patient’s skin, to create a cavity that matches the shape of her remaining, natural breast. The stem cell-enhanced fat solution is then injected into the scaffold. Over time, the scaffold is filled by the multiplying fat cells which obtain the necessary nutrients from blood vessels surgically wrapped around the scaffold.

The first trials will likely require that the scaffold is removed at the end of the reconstruction process though there is some talk of making the scaffold absorbable in the future so this extra step can be avoided.

Right now the focus remains on growing a breast made completely of fat, without breast glandular tissue, milk ducts or nipple-areolar tissue. The nipple and areola will therefore still need to be reconstructed as an additional step.

These developments are very exciting. I am sure this is the direction breast reconstruction is going in. The most advanced techniques currently available, like the DIEP flap for instance, already use the patient's own fat to recreate a very natural breast. In the case of the DIEP flap, this tissue (fat and skin) is taken from the lower abdomen, providing the benefit of a tummy-tuck at the same time.

While DIEP flap breast reconstruction only takes a few hours (as opposed to eight months), it does involve major surgery and the creation of scars on another part of the body (lower abdomen). In addition, women still need a second surgery for "fine tuning" and nipple reconstruction. In essence then, the reconstruction process can still be fairly drawn out and take several months. I am sure many women will be eager to avoid major surgery and scarring for what could be a very similar end result once this new technique is optimized.

*****

Dr Chrysopoulo is a board certified plastic surgeon specializing in breast reconstruction and scar healing. Keep up to date with the latest news in breast cancer reconstruction at The Breast Cancer Reconstruction Blog. Also join us on Facebook and Twitter!

*****

Breast Reconstruction Report: "I wanted to heal my way"

By Lisa Bernhard

I was 29 years old when my gray-haired surgeon looked at me from across his desk and said, "I'd recommend a mastectomy." My dad, seated to my left, exhaled hard. To my right, my mom sat in silence. Family history had repeated itself: My grandmother underwent a mastectomy at age 39. Now it would be me. But in the four days since my diagnosis, I had researched and stumbled upon a choice my grandmother never had.

"It's OK," I said to my dad. "They can rebuild me."

They did. In one nine-hour procedure, a cancer surgeon performed a skin-sparing mastectomy, removing the nipple and tissue inside my right breast but leaving most of the skin intact. Then a plastic surgeon performed a free-flap reconstruction, extracting a portion of my stomach skin and fat and microscopically reconnecting it to my chest. Later, he reconstructed the nipple. The result was a breast that looks and feels like...my breast.

In the 14 years since, my reconstructed chest has seen me through highs and lows: confident in an evening gown while reporting from the Oscars as a TV correspondent; sorrowful, at times, when standing naked under bright bathroom lights, the faint scars tracing my areola reminders of invading disease and scalpels. Yearly screenings send my heart pounding, but my surgery has helped me be hopeful about the future.

Of course, some women don't want any kind of reconstruction, sometimes due to health reasons or as a matter of preference. But women who do choose it report significant, lasting psychological benefits, in a way that transcends physical beauty, according to a study by Amy K. Alderman, M.D., assistant professor of plastic surgery at the University of Michigan Medical School in Ann Arbor. "Women tell me they feel whole again and more able to put cancer behind them," she explains.

Which is why I'm alarmed that many women don't know that options like the one I selected exist. Nearly 70 percent of women eligible for reconstruction aren't informed of their reconstructive options, according to a 2007 study by Dr. Alderman. Almost 65 percent of general surgeons said they believe patients lack interest in reconstruction, and less than one in four consistently refers breast cancer patients to plastic surgeons.

Meanwhile, plastic surgeons often limit the time they devote to cancer patients, because they tend to lose money treating them. Insurance reimbursements—which are roughly based on what Medicare pays—are paltry. In the case of free-flap surgery, plastic surgeons can charge $7,000 to $25,000 per breast; the average Medicare reimbursement in 2007 was $1,737. As a result, some doctors won't accept insurance for reconstructive surgeries, forcing patients to pay out of pocket. Others steer patients toward more profitable types of reconstruction, regardless of what's best medically, says Mark Sultan, M.D., my reconstructive surgeon and chief of the division of plastic surgery at St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center and Beth Israel Medical Center in New York City. Insurers reimburse implant reconstruction at roughly the same level as a flap, but surgery takes only about an hour. "Doctors may think, Why do a six-hour operation when I am paid the same amount for a one-hour implant?" Dr. Sultan says. "They may convince themselves, consciously or unconsciously, that the patient is a better candidate for an implant."



Comment by Dr C:

I completely agree with Dr Sultan and I strongly encourage all women considering breast reconstruction to research all their reconstructive options. Unfortunately, some patients will have to consider traveling for some of the more advanced procedures. A major consideration for most people is obviously cost. Patients must be aware of the practice of balance billing which can add thousands of dollars to the out-of-pocket expenses.


*****

Keep up to date with the latest news in breast reconstruction at The Breast Cancer Reconstruction Blog. Also follow us on Twitter!

*****

Breast Cancer Reconstruction And Health Care Reform - What Does It Mean For You?

By Sharon Lacey

What does health care reform mean for patients with breast cancer and how will it affect you?

Well, it could mean...

Even though you or your loved one could benefit from advanced breast reconstructive surgery after mastectomy (like the DIEP flap procedure for example), your plastic surgeon might well have to say “no”.

While this may sound extreme to many of you, this would happen if comparative-effectiveness research rules that the benefits of the surgery for the average patient just don't justify its price tag, especially when compared with yesterday's treatments (like tissue expanders for example).

Unfortunately, medical advances and "cutting-edge" procedures do come at a price. Though this does mean certain procedures are more expensive, it has also ensured the United States has stayed at the leading edge of health care in the world, at least until now.

In an enormous break with tradition, such cost considerations based on averages will be factored into medical practice guidelines. These will function as an invisible hand that puts a brake on the more expensive procedures even though they benefit certain patients.

Standardized practice guidelines will be evident everywhere, even embedded into your doctor's government-certified computer: as described in the Obama budget, computer pop-ups will appear to help your doctor make decisions. (And through the same systems, his or her choices can be monitored for consistency with the guidelines.)

More uniform care will certainly improve weak performing doctors, but many experts worry about intruding on the seasoned judgment of the good physician. It remains to be seen how government micromanaging—if not rationing—of care, driven by reasons other than patient well-being, will go down,… particularly when that patient has a face.

*****

Keep up to date with the latest news in breast reconstruction at The Breast Cancer Reconstruction Blog. Also follow us on Twitter.

*****

Impact of Radiation on Breast Reconstruction

Radiation therapy is often recommended as part of breast cancer treatment. Patients undergoing lumpectomy receive radiation routinely once they've healed from surgery. Some mastectomy patients also need radiation after surgery depending on the size and characteristics of the breast cancer.

I think it is fair to say that most reconstructive breast surgeons, myself included, are not particularly fond of radiation because of the way it can impact the patient's tissues and breast reconstruction in general. Nonetheless, it is important to remember that "life comes before breast" and in certain cases there is a definite benefit for the patient in having radiation therapy.

Radiation techniques have improved significantly over the years which has decreased the potential side effects. Having said that, it is important patients realize what these potential side effects are. Anyone who is facing radiation therapy must discuss all the potential risks with their their radiation oncologist beforehand.

So what's the problem with radiation therapy from a plastic surgeon's perspective?... It can cause toughening (fibrosis) and shrinking (contracture) of the patient's tissue which makes the tissue lose its elasticity - the skin can become more tough and rigid. Skin color changes are common, red at first turning more brown over time. Radiation can also cause mild, superficial burn injuries. More serious long-term risks include damage to underlying organs such as the lungs and heart.

Women undergoing lumpectomy are often told that most of their breast will be preserved and that radiation is given "as insurance" to decrease the risk of the cancer returning (ie recurrence). What many women don't appreciate is that the breast can end up looking vastly different after radiation (shrinking, firmness, etc), even though they chose treatment that would "save the breast". Many women end up going to see a plastic surgeon because of these changes and the resulting significant asymmetry.

Radiation after a tissue reconstruction (eg tram flap, diep flap) can cause the reconstructed breast to shrink and become more firm. Fortunately, recent advances in radiation technology have made it more "reconstruction friendly" and it is rare for us to see significant radiation damage to the reconstructed breast in patients treated in centers specializing in breast cancer care. However, patients facing radiation after flap breast reconstruction should know that there is still a risk of needing further reconstructive surgery to correct changes caused by the radiation therapy. One study found a re-operation rate of almost 30% in patients receiving radiation after TRAM flap reconstruction.

Tissue expander and implant reconstructions fair worse with radiation than tissue reconstructions. The complication rates in this setting are much higher than with flaps, including complete failure of the reconstruction altogether and removal of the implant. Some surgeons routinely offer implant reconstructions to patients that are either facing or have already had radiation therapy. There are articles published in the plastic surgery literature supporting it. I have to respectfully disagree (strongly). In my experience mixing implants with radiation typically ends badly. I will only offer this in very rare instances.

I hope this info helps.

Dr C

******

Dr Chrysopoulo is a board certified plastic surgeon specializing in breast reconstruction surgery after mastectomy. In-Network for most US insurance plans. For more information please call (800) 692-5565 or email patientadvocate@prmaplasticsurgery.com.

******

Texas Plastic Surgeons Offer Innovative New TUG Flap Procedure to Recreate Natural Breasts After Mastectomy

San Antonio, TX (PRWEB) February 23, 2009 -- Plastic, Reconstructive & Microsurgical Associates (PRMA) of South Texas, a leading breast reconstruction surgery practice in San Antonio, is now offering women the Transverse Upper Gracilis (TUG) flap procedure to restore their breasts after mastectomy. PRMA plastic surgeons specialize in breast reconstruction after breast cancer, with particular expertise in advanced microsurgical techniques using the patient's own living tissue.

"Increasingly, women facing mastectomy prefer new breasts sculpted from their own skin and fat, thereby avoiding the problems that often occur with implants," says Dr Chrysopoulo. Breasts shaped from living tissue have a natural look and feel that can't be achieved using implants or temporary prostheses. "While most patients prefer the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap technique which uses a woman's lower abdominal tissue, it is a technique that may not be an option for those who have had previous tummy tucks, who don't have adequate abdominal fat, or who prefer not to scar their abdomens. TUG flap surgery is a viable option for these women; a way to restore their natural breasts with excellent results."

Both the TUG and DIEP flap procedures are complex, technically demanding microsurgical procedures requiring special skill and experience. During the TUG procedure, surgeons transplant a flap of skin, tissue and muscle from a woman's upper thigh to her chest. The process has distinct advantages compared to other types of natural tissue breast reconstruction: thigh tissue has superior contour, shape and projection; loss of the muscle does not inhibit an individual's mobility or function; scarring is not easily visible, and the procedure produces a cosmetic thigh lift as well as a new breast.

"TUG flap surgery allows a woman to come out of the operating room the same way she went in," says Chrysopoulo. "With nice-sized natural breasts in place." The TUG flap is an excellent post-mastectomy option for women who have mastectomy to either treat or prevent breast cancer.

Candidates for the TUG are women who:
• have small to medium-sized breasts.
• want to avoid an abdominal scar.
• lack sufficient abdominal tissue for DIEP breast reconstruction.
• have had a previous tummy tuck or other abdominal surgery.

PRMA board-certified surgeons routinely offer both reconstructive and cosmetic breast procedures, and perform more than 400 microsurgical breast reconstructions annually for patients from Texas and across the U.S. PRMA surgeons are in-network for most U.S. insurance plans. Visit www.prma-Enhance.com or contact 800-692-5565 to schedule a consultation or for more information about the TUG flap or any other reconstructive breast procedure.

*****

Breast Reconstruction Surgery - Part II - Muscle Flap Reconstruction

Women interested in breast reconstruction after mastectomy have several reconstruction options to choose from. In Part I of this series we discussed tissue expanders, breast implants and Alloderm.

Though implant reconstruction remains the most common method of breast reconstruction in the US, many women are now steering away from this option, opting instead to use their own tissue for more “natural” results. Muscle flaps have, until fairly recently, been the only choice available for these tissue reconstructions. The most commonly offered muscle flaps are the latissimus and TRAM flap procedures.

Latissimus Dorsi Flap:

The latissimus procedure uses muscle from the back of the shoulder blade which is brought around to the breast mound to help create a new breast. During the procedure a section of skin, fat and muscle is detached from the back and brought to the breast area.

Many patients also need a tissue expander placed under the muscle flap in order to obtain a satisfactory result. The expander is replaced by a permanent implant at a second procedure down the line.

Patients will have a scar on their back shoulder region that can sometimes be seen through a tank top, swimsuit or sundress. The upper back can be numb or sore for a few following this procedure until the nerves grow back and the incisions are completely healed.

Women who are very active in sports should know that this procedure can reduce ability to participate in activities like golf, climbing, swimming, or tennis.

TRAM (Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous) Flap:

The TRAM flap was the first procedure to describe use of one of the rectus abdominis muscles (sit-up muscles) for breast reconstruction. This procedure begins with an incision from hip to hip rather like a “tummy-tuck”.

A "flap" of skin, fat and one of the patient's abdominal muscles is typically tunneled under the skin to the chest to create a new breast. This is known as a pedicled TRAM flap. Recovery from the TRAM flap procedure can be difficult and painful and there is a risk of abdominal bulging (or “pooching”) and even hernia. Long-term, the patient has to adapt to the loss of some abdominal strength (up to 20%) which most active patients will notice.

In cases where both breasts are being reconstructed, both abdominal muscles are sacrificed and transferred to the chest (one for each breast). The loss of abdominal strength in these situations is far greater and very significant.

Over the years and with the introduction of microsurgery, the procedure has evolved several times with each modification preserving more and more abdominal muscle. This has made postoperative recovery a little easier and has decreased the potential for abdominal complications somewhat.

The latest evolution in breast reconstruction is  “perforator flap surgery”. These techniques use skin and fat from various parts of the body. Since no muscle is sacrificed recovery is much easier and muscle strength and function are preserved long-term. These techniques will be discussed in Part III of this breast reconstruction series.

*****

Dr Chrysopoulo is a board certified plastic surgeon specializing in breast reconstruction after mastectomy including the DIEP flap and Alloderm one-step procedures. In-network for most US insurance plans. Toll Free (800) 692-5565. Latest news in breast reconstruction surgery and research available at The Breast Cancer Reconstruction Blog.

*****

Breast Reconstruction With Tissue Much Safer Than Implants When Radiation Planned After Mastectomy

A study published in the November issue of the International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics examined the effect of radiation therapy on different methods of immediate breast reconstruction surgery. For breast cancer patients who receive radiation therapy after a mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction, autologous tissue reconstruction (ie reconstruction using their own tissue) provides fewer long-term complications and superior cosmetic results than breast reconstruction with a tissue expander and subsequent breast implant.

Many women choose to undergo breast reconstruction surgery at the same time as their mastectomy procedure (under the same anesthetic). This avoids many of the psycho-social issues women face when dealing with a flat chest after mastectomy alone. However, frequently radiation can negatively affect the outcome of reconstruction and increase the risk of long-term complications.

Radiation therapy is increasingly becoming the standard of care for high-risk breast cancer patients after mastectomy in an attempt to decrease local cancer recurrence. However, this can cause a problem for both patients and their radiation oncologists.

Researchers at the Department of Radiation Oncology at Long Island Radiation Therapy in Garden City, N.Y., the Department of Surgery at Long Island Jewish Hospital in New Hyde Park, N.Y., the Department of Surgery at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, N.Y., and the Department of Surgery at Winthrop University Hospital in Mineola, N.Y., looked at whether the type of reconstruction performed in women receiving radiation after a mastectomy had an impact on their long-term outcomes.

Two general types of breast reconstruction are available for patients facing mastectomy for breast cancer: autologous tissue reconstruction utilizing the patient's own tissue (eg DIEP flap, GAP flap, TRAM flap, or latissimus flap) transferred to the chest to recreate the breast(s); and tissue expander/implant reconstruction which involves placement of an inflatable tissue expander (temporary saline implant) and exchange for a permanent implant (saline or silicone) at a separate procedure later on.

This study involved the largest reported series of patients who sequentially underwent mastectomy, immediate reconstruction and postmastectomy radiation therapy. Ninety-two patients were observed for a period of 38 months following breast reconstruction and radiation therapy.

Researchers found that autologous breast reconstruction is better tolerated by breast cancer patients because it is associated with fewer long-term complications and better cosmetic results than tissue expander/implant reconstruction.

None of the 23 patients reconstructed with their own tissue required further surgery while 33% of tissue expander/implant patients needed surgery to correct a problem with their reconstruction. Eighty-three percent of autologous reconstruction patients reported acceptable cosmetic results, as opposed to only 54% of implant patients.

"This study is useful for patients who are candidates for either [method of reconstruction] and are making a decision with regards to reconstruction technique," Jigna Jhaveri, M.D., lead author of the study and a radiation oncologist at Advanced Radiation Centers of New York in Hauppauge, N.Y., said. "Our study provides evidence that patients who undergo autologous tissue reconstruction and radiation therapy have fewer long term complications and better cosmetic outcomes than those who undergo tissue expander/implant reconstruction and radiation therapy."

*****

Here's my take....

While some plastic surgeons will disagree with this statement I strongly believe that breast implants and radiation therapy do not get along (at all). I feel the complication rate in implant-reconstructed women receiving radiation therapy is very high, particularly long-term. The handful of women that "do fine" in the short-term will very frequently end up with hard, uncomfortable breasts as the irradiated tissue firms-up over time and squeezes down on the implant. In my opinion the re-operation rate is too high for tissue expander/implant reconstruction to be offered as a routine option when radiation is on the table. This study confirms that breast reconstruction using the patient's own tissue is far safer than tissue expander/implant reconstruction in women facing radiation therapy after mastectomy.

Dr C

******

Dr Chrysopoulo is a board certified plastic surgeon specializing in breast reconstruction surgery after mastectomy, particularly advanced perforator flap techniques such as the DIEP flap procedure. PRMA Plastic Surgery, San Antonio, Texas. Toll Free: (800) 692-5565. Keep up to date with the latest breast reconstruction news by following The Breast Cancer Reconstruction Blog.

******

Breast Cancer Recurrence Not Related To Method Of Breast Reconstruction

One of my breast cancer patients called me today. She recently underwent bilateral mastectomies and immediate breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps. She recovered very well from the surgery but unfortunately her pathology results showed that she had cancer extending almost to the edge of the mastectomy specimen. The exact medical jargon used by the pathologist was.... "invasive carcinoma extending to 1mm from the margin". She also had DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ) "extending to 0.2mm from the margin."

From a purist's perspective, these results still represent "clear margins". In other words, no tumor was found at the edge of the mastectomy specimen so there is no reason to believe there is any cancer left in my patient's breast. BUT, it's very close and that is certainly worrisome.

She called me today because she visited with her oncologist (cancer doc) and a radiation oncologist (cancer doc specializing in radiotherapy) and radiation therapy was recommended (in addition to the planned chemotherapy).

She explained to the radiation oncologist that she was worried the radiation therapy would ruin her DIEP flap reconstruction. She is right to be fearful of this - patients undergoing radiation therapy after an autologous reconstruction (ie a reconstruction using their own tissue) have a 28% risk of needing further surgery to correct asymmetry caused by the radiation changes (usually firming and shrinking) of the irradiated breast.

The response she received from the radiation oncologist baffled me (and is actually the reason behind this blogpost)...... "DIEP flap? What's a DIEP flap?.... if you'd had a TRAM flap then you wouldn't be needing radiation".

What?

This is a ridiculous statement. Let me clarify why...

This lady is being recommended radiation therapy as an insurance policy to decrease the risk of local recurrence (cancer coming back in the same breast). This is a consequence of her "near margins" which in turn are a result of the mastectomy specimen. Obviously the mastectomy was completed before the reconstruction was even started. If this lady had only had the mastectomy (without reconstruction) the margins would be the same. The breast reconstruction, and moreover, the type of breast reconstruction has absolutely nothing to do with it. The margins, the pathologist reading and the recommendation for radiation therapy would have been exactly the same whether reconstruction was performed or not.

So what's the take home message if you're considering breast reconstruction surgery? Choose whichever method of reconstruction is best for you. Your decision will not influence the likelihood of your cancer coming back in any way. The risk of cancer recurrence is related to the characteristics of the cancer itself and the mastectomy margins, not the method of reconstruction.

Dr C

******

Dr Chrysopoulo is a board certified breast reconstruction surgeon specializing in DIEP flap breast reconstruction surgery. He and his partners perform over 350 DIEP flap procedures each year with a success rate of over 99%. PRMA Plastic Surgery, San Antonio, Texas. Toll Free: (800) 692-5565. Keep up to date with the latest breast reconstruction news by following Dr Chrysopoulo's Breast Cancer Reconstruction Blog.

******

Christina Applegate Mastectomy Calls Attention To Need For Team Approach To Breast Cancer Reconstruction

Actress Christina Applegate’s public disclosure of her breast cancer, her decision to have a double mastectomy, and plans to go forth with breast reconstruction surgery, calls attention to the need for a medical “team” approach in the treatment and recovery from breast cancer.

“A decision to have breast reconstruction is a decision to have plastic surgery. And, that ought to be done by a plastic surgeon. This is what we train for and do everyday. Plastic surgeons have pioneered and refined all of the state-of-the-art techniques in breast reconstruction including implant approaches and autologous tissue (natural) transfers,” said Richard D’Amico, MD, president of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS).

The methods for treating women with breast cancer have evolved and we are seeing scientific advancements in the treatment of this disease. These improvements can be attributed to a strong collaboration between medical specialties, in particular radiologists, pathologists, psychologists, general oncologic surgeons, medical oncologists, and plastic surgeons.

The ASPS says breast cancer patients should insist that their treatment be handled by a “team” of physicians, including plastic surgeons, with the appropriate expertise for each procedure and level of care. This, in turn, gives the breast cancer patient the best chance for positive outcomes.

“ASPS Member Surgeons are carrying out the cutting-edge research for constant outcomes improvement. Our members have the foremost training, education and experience in breast reconstruction, and should be a part of every breast care team,” said Dr. D’Amico.

Patients should not assume that anyone other than a board-certified plastic surgeon affiliated with an accredited facility is qualified to perform breast reconstruction. While technology has made breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and reconstruction better than ever, it does not negate the need for medical expertise within each area.

According to a recent breast reconstruction study published in the Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 98 percent of elective mastectomy patients would have breast reconstruction again.

“That’s a success and satisfaction rate that should not be compromised,” said Dr. D’Amico.
According to ASPS statistics, more than 57,000 breast reconstruction procedures were performed in 2007.

******

Dr Chrysopoulo is board certified in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and specializes in breast reconstruction surgery after mastectomy for breast cancer. He and his partners perform hundreds of microsurgical breast reconstructions with perforator flaps each year including the DIEP flap procedure. PRMA Plastic Surgery, San Antonio, Texas. Toll Free: (800) 692-5565. Keep up to date with the latest breast reconstruction news by following Dr Chrysopoulo's Breast Cancer Reconstruction Blog.

******

US Panel Mulls Minimum Breast Cancer Hospital Stay

By Kim Dixon

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A congressional panel on Wednesday said it has bipartisan support for a bill requiring health insurers to pay for a minimum 48-hour hospital stay after breast cancer treatment, to combat what critics call "drive-through" surgeries.

About 20 U.S. states have such a minimum insurance requirement for women undergoing mastectomies or lumpectomies to treat breast cancer. Advocates of the bill say federal legislation is needed to equalize coverage across the nation.

"Having access to appropriate medical care should not be dependent on the state you live in," said Rep. Frank Pallone, the New Jersey Democrat who chairs the health subcommittee of the Energy and Commerce Committee.

Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer among women after skin cancer, killing more than 41,000 women a year in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The bill has bipartisan support and 219 co-sponsors in the House of Representatives. A companion bill in the Senate has 19 co-sponsors thus far.

Women with breast cancer often undergo a mastectomy, in which the entire breast is completely removed, or a lumpectomy, a less drastic surgery that is followed by radiation therapy.

About two-thirds of the 125,000 women who undergo mastectomies in the U.S. annually leave the hospital a few hours after surgery, without regard to their health, because their insurance will not pay for a longer stay, according to testimony from Dr. Kristen Zarfos, a fellow at the American College of Surgeons.

But America's Health Insurance Plans, an industry group for most major health plans such as UnitedHealth Group and WellPoint Inc , called the bill unnecessary.

"We do not think that it is a good idea on the state level or the federal level to be putting clinical guidelines into statute," group spokeswoman Susan Pisano said.

Most health insurers treat each case on a "medical necessity" basis. "We think there are women who are satisfied with shorter lengths of stay," she said.


DISEASE WINNERS AND LOSERS

Singer-songwriter and breast cancer survivor Sheryl Crow also testified at the House panel's hearing, expressing support for a second bill that would provide $40 million annually for five years for federal research into environmental factors linked to breast cancer.
"There is little financial incentive for anyone else to do this research," Crow told lawmakers.

She added: "I have no idea why I got breast cancer or what I can say to others on how to prevent it."

Some Republicans and a federal health official said the research bill would tie the government's hands and interfere with science.
"In general, prescribing a specific way of conducting federal research could have the unintended consequence of narrowing the field of inquiry and promoting an unwise use of precious resources," said Deborah Winn, associate director of epidemiology and genetics at the National Cancer Institute.

Because the bill establishes a panel to set research priorities, it could hamper current efforts, Winn said.

A Senate companion bill includes changes related to the peer review process that could make a compromise possible, Winn said.
The committee's top Republican, Rep. Joe Barton of Texas, said he is worried that Congress is too susceptible to the power of disease groups.

For example, advocates for breast cancer are among the most organized and best funded advocacy groups, Barton said. If Congress responded to their entreaties, it would be "picking winners and losers in terms of who gets the most research. Where does that leave liver cancer? ... What about autism ... diabetes?" he asked.

*****

Lifetime Television has put this bill on their Web page with a petition drive to show support. Last year over half the House signed on. To show your support, please click on the link below. If you choose to sign the petition you will not need to give more than your name, state, and zip code.

Lifetime TV breast cancer petition - support the bill


******

Double Mastectomies To Prevent Breast Cancer Increase

From 1998 through 2003, the rate of double mastectomies among women in the United States who had cancer diagnosed in only one breast more than doubled, according to a report in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

"Many surgeons had noticed that more women were requesting double mastectomy for treatment of the cancer in only one breast. So, we weren't surprised by the overall trend, but we were very surprised by the magnitude," lead author Dr. Todd M. Tuttle said in an interview with Reuters Health.

What is driving this trend will require further studies, added Tuttle, from the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. In the meantime, he advised, it is critical that physicians be aware and inform their patients that "although there may be sound reasons for undergoing double mastectomy (avoidance of future mammograms and preventing a new cancer), the procedure does not improve breast cancer survival."

The new study involved an analysis of data for 152,755 women who were diagnosed with cancer in one breast between 1998 and 2003 and entered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER), the US National Cancer Institutes' database.
Overall, 4,969 patients elected to undergo preventative mastectomy in the other breast. The rates of the operation were 3.3 percent among women who had any surgery, including those who underwent single mastectomy or only had their tumor removed, and 7.7 percent among mastectomy patients.

The overall rate of double mastectomy - that included removal of an unaffected breast climbed from 1.8 percent in 1998 to 4.5 percent in 2003, the report indicates. Among mastectomy patients, the rate rose from 4.2 percent to 11.0 percent. These trends were noted for patients at any cancer stage and were still apparent at the end of the study period.

Characteristics of the women who underwent double mastectomy included younger patient age, non-Hispanic white race, lobular breast cancer type, and a prior cancer diagnosis, the researchers found. Large tumor size was associated with an increase in the overall rate of the procedure, but with a decrease in the rate among mastectomy patients.

"The main unanswered question from this research is: why are more women choosing to undergo double mastectomy?" Tuttle said. "For our next research project, we will interview breast cancer patients before and after surgery to determine what factors influenced their surgical decisions. We will also interview patients' surgeons to determine their advice."

AUTHOR: Anthony J. Brown, MD
SOURCE: Journal of Clinical Oncology, October 22, 2007 online.

******

The Hype Around DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction And How To Find A DIEP Flap Surgeon

If you are a woman facing mastectomy you have a decision to make: do I want breast reconstruction? If the answer is “yes”, plastic surgery holds the key. Although reconstruction cannot replace the breast(s) you were born with or allow you to breastfeed, it can restore your natural silhouette and make you feel “whole” again following mastectomy.

Depending on your health, breast reconstruction can be performed immediately after your mastectomy surgery so you can wake up with new breasts already in place. While the cosmetic results with immediate reconstruction are generally superior, breast reconstruction can also be performed at a later time once the cancer treatment has been completed.

The DIEP flap breast procedure is today’s gold standard in breast reconstruction. Advances in breast reconstruction have made it possible to use excess skin and fat from the abdomen (rather like the tissue removed during a tummy tuck) to construct a new breast without the need for implants or the sacrifice of abdominal muscle. This procedure, known as the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap, is a sophisticated modification of an existing procedure known as the TRAM (Transverse Rectus Abdominus Myocutaneous) flap.

TRAM flap surgery is a common breast reconstruction technique that requires the rectus abdominus (sit-up) muscle to be sacrificed and relocated to the upper abdomen. Unfortunately, this technique can be associated with significant post-operative pain, prolonged recovery, loss of abdominal muscle strength (up to 20%), abdominal bulging (or “pooching”), and even abdominal hernia.

DIEP flap breast reconstruction is similar to TRAM flap surgery but spares the rectus abdominus muscle. SKIN AND FAT ONLY are removed from the abdomen, transplanted to the chest and connected using microsurgery to create the new breast. NO MUSCLE is sacrificed. As the sit-up muscle is left behind in its natural place many of the above complications are avoided and the patient essentially receives a tummy tuck at the same time as the breast reconstruction. There also tends to be far less pain following the DIEP procedure, and a quicker recovery time.

Knowing the significant advantages of the DIEP flap it is easy to understand the reason for all the hype, especially for active individuals who don’t want to sacrifice the strength of their abdomen. A breast that has been reconstructed with fat and skin will also look and feel more natural than an implant reconstruction and will last longer. Unlike an implant, the reconstructed breast also ages like a natural breast.

As with all types of breast reconstruction however, 2 or 3 procedures performed a few months apart are often required to complete the reconstruction process and to obtain the best cosmetic result. Unfortunately, due to the complexity of the DIEP procedure very few centers in the US perform DIEP flap surgery so many patients will have to travel for the procedure. The good news is that many of these DIEP flap centers will accommodate out-of-state and even international patients.

To learn if a breast center or plastic surgeon near you offers DIEP flap breast reconstruction, please check the following websites:
www.breastrecon.com and www.diepsisters.com

The lists on these websites seem fairly thorough but there are plastic surgeons out there who perform DIEP breast reconstruction that have not made the lists (for whatever reason). Having said that, currently there are only about 40 plastic surgeons in the US that routinely perform the DIEP flap procedure. Before choosing a plastic surgeon ensure that he/she is certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery and has extensive experience with the DIEP flap procedure. Ask about the success rate of the procedure in their hands (most DIEP flap specialists boast a flap survival rate of at least 97%) and how many DIEP flaps they have performed.

Insurance companies are federally mandated to pay for the cost of breast reconstruction. Unfortunately, some patients will still face difficulties in gaining access to a DIEP flap surgeon and the procedure. Here again it pays to seek out plastic surgeons who specialize in the DIEP procedure as typically insurance specialists are available to help patients with insurance issues.

Learn more about the DIEP flap procedure and other breast reconstruction options here.


******

Dr Chrysopoulo is board certified in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and specializes in breast reconstruction surgery after mastectomy for breast cancer. He and his partners perform hundreds of microsurgical breast reconstructions with perforator flaps each year. PRMA Plastic Surgery, San Antonio, Texas. Toll Free: (800) 692-5565. Keep up to date with the latest breast reconstruction news by following Dr Chrysopoulo's Breast Reconstruction Blog.

*****